Over the past decade, the geopolitical club known as the Group of Twenty (G20) seemed like a worthy idea, but it was also tedious.

During the 2008 financial crisis, Tough Group (among which represent 80% of the global economy) briefly gained its reputation and relevance by building a collective response to quell the crisis. Since then, it has advocated for smart reforms in areas such as financial regulation.

But the club is so big and consensus-oriented that it becomes unwieldy. Its meetings — and communiques — tend to be lackluster, especially when the finance minister is involved.

However, this is no longer the case. Later this month, on April 20, G20 finance ministers will meet in Washington. However, the hot drama that is currently breaking out may be more common in high school cafeterias.

Most notably, on Wednesday, U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, tell congress “We will not be participating in some [G20] If there are Russians present, have a meeting”. This was to protest Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine, meaning she might boycott the April 20 events.

It’s very “embarrassing” for Indonesia, which currently holds the rotating presidency – as a teenager might put it – deciding who to invite or not. The G20 was established in 1999 and has no formal founding rules. But so far it has been argued that a member can only be fired if the others unite against them.

After all, that’s what happened to the more exclusive G7 clubs before. In 1998, the G7 added Russia to its ranks, creating the G8; but in 2014, following Russia’s invasion of Crimea, seven founding members joined forces to exclude it.

But the problem for Indonesia is that some G20 members, including China, don’t want to “trick” Russia now. Russian President Vladimir Putin apparently wants to attend the G20 summit later this year.

In order to resolve the dispute, the Indonesian government may eventually have to be scrapped Common Communiqué of 20 April. But that makes the G20 seem impotent. “Compared to its important role in the global financial crisis, it is difficult for the G20 and its various affiliates to be a key club for global cooperation, given cyber interference, war, possible crimes against humanity and general superpower struggle,” Paul Towers said. The former Bank of England governor, who has upcoming book on these issues.

“That doesn’t preclude it from being a useful forum . . . but it’s not easy because it requires a certain level of candor, trust and reliability,” he added. As one former finance minister put it: “The G20 could die.”

Should investors care? Yes, for symbolic and practical reasons. When it became clear that the Bretton Woods institutions of the 20th century did not fit in the post-Cold War world, the institution was created to promote cooperation and globalization in the 21st century. If the G20 were to die out now, it would underscore the reversal of globalization and show that we face what political analyst Ian Bremmer calls a G-Zero world — a world where no one is in charge. This is shocking.

What’s more obvious is that the G20’s work is desperately needed now. As Yellen herself noted this week, “the spillover effects of the crisis are exacerbating economic vulnerabilities in many countries already facing higher debt burdens and limited policy options as they recover from Covid-19”. U.S. rate hikes will exacerbate these “vulnerabilities.”

Take the sovereign debt restructuring issue, for example. This is a tedious but important topic that the G20 aims to address. Two months ago, the group appeared to finally be starting in 2022 to create a more viable system for restructuring the debts of poor countries.

This is urgently needed because (As I pointed out recently) The Paris Club system of restructuring debt is no longer effective because China is out of it – and it already provides two-thirds of low-income country loans. Worse, disorderly default risk is rising rapidly.crisis now Sri Lanka (of which China accounts for a large portion of the country’s loans) is a good example.

The Indonesian government previously seemed to be in a good position to push for reforms not only because of its relationship with China, but also lobbying has begun A shared commitment to debt transparency. But this is now derailed. It could also fall apart at a time when the G20’s work on preventing disorderly defaults is more needed than ever.

In pointing this out, I am not suggesting that the West was wrong to exclude Russia from the G20. All possible sanctions are needed to stop the onslaught on Ukraine. But here’s the key: If the bloc is now rendered powerless, Washington urgently needs to find other ways to work with emerging market players. Action around the sovereign debt restructuring agenda would be a good place to start.

Also, investors should take note if this type of collaborative initiative isn’t coming soon. Pouting, sneaking and gossip are lethal tactics by mature governments. Especially when the global economy is in disarray – a country like Sri Lanka is suffering.

[email protected]