Airlines threaten to ground many passenger and cargo flights as cellular carriers refuse to change 5G plans

Airlines threaten to ground many passenger and cargo flights as cellular carriers refuse to change 5G plans

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

[ad_1]

There’s nothing quite like a great fight between Godzilla and Mothra, provided you’re not caught between them. The show, which showcases airlines and wireless carriers beyond 5G, will shine on Wednesday. Major airlines have threatened to wreak havoc by canceling passenger and cargo flights they believe are at risk of 5G disruption. Remember, the reason why people would do seemingly insane things like getting into aluminum cans flying above 30,000 feet is the airline’s safety record, a product of ruthless inspection and control. With just two Boeing 737 Max crashes, the FAA has lost its status as the global regulator of American-made planes, a position that may never be regained.

Wireless carriers have scoffed at airline requests not to deploy 5G transmitters within 2 miles of airports. The airline did win two delays and some concessions at about 50 major airports, but it felt it was enough to change course compared to Verizon and AT&T, which will launch their 5G service on Jan. 19.Network operators apparently think that The two of them spent $68 billion on spectrum And having a catchy regulator gives them the upper hand.

What AT&T and Verizon miss is that air travel and shipping are far more important to American business than blazing phone speeds. As Paul Maud’Dib said in Dune, “He who can destroy a thing truly controls it.”

Reuters published an exclusive report on the airline revolt. from its fragments:

On Monday, the chief executives of major U.S. passenger and cargo airlines warned of a “catastrophic” aviation crisis in less than 36 hours, when AT&T (TN) and Verizon (VZ.N) will deploy new 5G services.

The airline warned that new C-band 5G service, scheduled to begin Wednesday, could leave a large number of wide-body planes out of service, “potentially stranded tens of thousands of Americans overseas” and cause “chaos” on U.S. flights…

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has warned that potential interference could affect sensitive aircraft instruments, such as the altimeter, and severely hinder low-visibility operations.

“This means that on a day like yesterday, more than 1,100 flights and 100,000 passengers will be cancelled, diverted or delayed,” the letter warned.

Late Monday, airlines were considering whether to start canceling some international flights scheduled to arrive in the U.S. on Wednesday…

Action is imminent, and airlines added in the letter include UPS Airlines, Alaska Airlines, Atlas Air, JetBlue Airways and FedEx. “Frankly, the business of the country will come to a standstill…

United Airlines separately warned late Monday that the problem could affect its more than 15,000 annual flights, 1.25 million passengers and a lot of cargo. “

Wireless believes the U.S. carrier’s approach is unreasonable because 5G has been deployed overseas without an airline incident. But they know it’s a bogus argument; the spectrum in the U.S. is right next to the air carrier’s frequencies, which isn’t the case elsewhere. As Vlad pointed out exist An earlier post on this line:

hmm, look This The U.S. has its own 5G band, unlike the rest of the world (except for the UHF bands that Japan and South Korea join). Maybe there’s a good technical reason the US must have spectrum, not just close to altimeter one (4.2-4.4 GHz), but actually overlapping?

Reader professor confirms:

But A4A said the issue remained unresolved as of December 30, with just a few days left until 3.7 GHz license 5G operations begin.According to A4A, the FCC has failed to explain why it rejected a 3.7 GHz license for evidence of “adverse effects of interference” on radio altimeters since the start of the C-band process

https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/airlines-file-emergency-petition-stop-5g-c-band-deployment-near-airports

and As we pointed out in the previous article, From a review of AVWeb:

Unfortunately, like those who are drawn to RF magic on a personal level, from HAMs on the street to engineers testing equipment in the lab, they have learned: simply because you want to transmit on a set of frequencies Doesn’t mean you won’t spread it on a whole bunch of other people either. Also, older devices were not designed with constraints that no one thought of at the time.

Mass-produced cheap RF equipment is one of the worst offenders, with millions of 5G base stations estimated to be deployed by the time the deployment is “done” for good coverage, the only way this massive infrastructure deployment remains profitable The route operator is for the equipment to be cheap and quick to install. Inexpensive means there can be QC issues, which means there can be a lot of unwanted emissions (including pop-fly stray emissions). The quick installation means people aren’t walking around doing field strength surveys to make sure the antennas aren’t being aimed so that they bounce or even shoot something directly when they finally approach the local airfield. While your radar altimeter is noticeably unstable as you fly over 5G coverage areas, this is unlikely to be an ongoing issue, but lab tests have proven that taking this seriously, given the sheer amount of interaction; Avionics The environment in which the equipment is designed to operate – definitely not a world where ERP transmitters in the multi-million kilowatt range are broadcast in high bandwidth 24/7, 365.

The last standoff occurred in early January, when AT&T and Verizon said they would not push back the Jan. 5 5G launch date, and airlines threatened emergency bans. As we’ve seen, the wireless carrier is two weeks back, but it doesn’t seem to be giving up much ground.

I think the operators will go to court, but will also start implementing shutdowns. If the courts don’t act fast enough, this mess will fall on the shoulders of a Biden administration. Whether Biden has the authority to use an executive order to rein in AT&T and Verizon, or whether only the courts or Congress can address this, is beyond my pay scale.

One benefit if airlines and cargo companies partially cease operations: it should sink Mayo Pete. Just imagine how Republicans would handle the fiasco if Buttigieg were the Democratic presidential nominee in 2024.

[ad_2]

Source link

More to explorer