We need real solutions to make the financial system work for everyone, not just the rich – Regulate Bitcoin News

We need real solutions to make the financial system work for everyone, not just the rich – Regulate Bitcoin News

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

[ad_1]

U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren believes that cryptocurrency is not the path to financial inclusion as claimed by cryptocurrency advocates. “Bitcoin ownership is even more concentrated in the top 1% of the population than the U.S. dollar,” she said, emphasizing the need for “real solutions to make the financial system work for everyone, not just the rich.”

Senator Elizabeth Warren talks about cryptocurrency and Bitcoin

US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) commented on cryptocurrency, Bitcoin and financial inclusion on Tuesday. She wrote on Twitter:

The crypto industry claims that encryption is the way to achieve financial inclusion, but Bitcoin ownership is even more concentrated in the top 1% than the U.S. dollar. We need real solutions to make the financial system work for everyone, not just the rich.

Her comment is in response article The Wall Street Journal claimed that the top 1% of Bitcoin holders “control more of the cryptocurrency share than the US dollar controlled by the wealthiest American households.” The author quoted a study by the National Bureau of Economic Research and wrote, “The top 10,000 A Bitcoin account holds 5 million Bitcoins, which is equivalent to approximately 232 billion U.S. dollars.”

Many Twitter users responded to Senator Warren’s tweets. A user told the Massachusetts senator: “This is not true. A fixed supply of bitcoin means that over time, ownership becomes less concentrated with adoption, use, and value creation. In addition to solving the problem of money printing. Besides, there is no other choice, because the problem of printing money will bring invisible taxes to ordinary citizens.”

Another user said to the senator on Twitter: “Your argument is flawed. So I can only assume that you don’t understand Bitcoin Not “full encryption”-it is Bitcoin. You only recognize Bitcoin As an’encryption’, it ignores the entire emerging’encryption industry’, which is based on the value transfer of a few cents. “

In addition, some people reminded Senator Warren that encryption is decentralized and applies to everyone, not just the rich. Some people questioned the claims in the Wall Street Journal article. Some people called the senator from Massachusetts “ignorant” and “good at manipulating”, emphasizing the need for education.

The senator recently called on regulators to “Clamp“It’s too late on stablecoins and decentralized finance (defi) platforms. “She said, “Defi is the most dangerous part of the crypto world. In July, she urged the U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen Urgently adopt policies to reduce encryption risks.

September, she Press down The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) solves the problem of interrupted crypto exchanges and high transaction fees. She also emphasized at the time that cryptocurrency is not a way to financial inclusion.

Tags in this story

Bitcoin, Bitcoin concentration, Bitcoin ownership, Decentralization, Go to financial institution, Elizabeth Warren, Financial inclusion, Financial system, The real solution, Stablecoin, U.S. Senator, U.S. Senator Warren

What do you think of Senator Elizabeth Warren’s comments? Please let us know in the comments section below.

Kevin Helms

As a student of Austrian economics, Kevin discovered Bitcoin in 2011 and has been an evangelist ever since. His interests lie in Bitcoin security, open source systems, network effects, and the intersection of economics and cryptography.




Image Source: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wikimedia Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for reference only. It is not a direct offer or invitation to buy or sell, nor is it a recommendation or endorsement of any product, service or company. Bitcoin Network Does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. The company or the author is not directly or indirectly responsible for any damage or loss caused or claimed to be caused by using or relying on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.



[ad_2]

Source link

More to explorer