Activity review

Judge Stephen Breyer exaggerated the virtues of civic education and crossed the ideological divide, arguing Friday that they would do so when enough people wanted their elected officials to work together.In the words of Breyer, the 82-year-old jurist During an extensive conversation with Jeffrey Rosen of the National Constitution Center, It was in the afternoon that Senate Republicans used procedures to obstruct Prohibit legislation That would create a bipartisan committee to investigate the riots in the Capitol on January 6.

Breyer used Zoom to speak in the courtroom of the Supreme Court. In the context of antique books and artworks borrowed from the National Gallery, they addressed a group of middle school and high school students. Breyer told the students that they need to know how the U.S. government works, “so that we can maintain it.” Breyer emphasized that this is “not the first time people are discouraged by the democratic process,” and the United States has experienced racism before. . Breyer admitted: “Of course, this is a bad system, except for other systems.” Breyer emphasized that the American political system is still an experiment. Breyer thought aloud, “Can it work?” He said to the students, “Your job depends on it.”

Rosen put pressure on Breyer, saying that many people believe that the US system has broken down. Rosen asked, what should we do to make it work? Breyer replied that he was “basically optimistic,” although he added that he did not know how much optimism was reasonable. Breyer explained that the late Senator Edward Kennedy, whom Breyer worked for early in his career, once said that the country is swinging and will eventually correct itself. He pointed out that when he needed Kennedy’s support and talked to them, he often saw Kennedy in contact with Republicans. Breyer suggested that once people start talking, they will eventually find something in common.

With the justices Plan to consider in autumn Mississippi abortion law aims to challenge Roy v. WadeRosen also asked Breyer about the role of precedent. Breyer replied that the law is partly about stability, allowing people to plan their lives. “If you keep changing it,” Breyer said, “people won’t know what to do.” On the other hand, Breyer argues that the more you change the law, the more people there will be. Ask the court to modify it.

Breyer, the court’s oldest justice, is facing increasing pressure from some liberals to retire and allow President Joe Biden to nominate young successors, while Democrats have Control of the Senate is limited. Breyer did not discuss his future plans last Friday.

He expressed enthusiasm to his colleagues in court, telling the audience, “Of course,” you can have friends with the judge, and their approach to the law is very different. Although Breyer and his colleagues did not always reach a consensus on the case, Breyer made it clear: “I have never heard angry voices.” Breyer emphasized that conservative judge Clarence Thomas (Clarence Thomas) ) Is a “very very decent person”.

Breyer’s discussion of the death of the late judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg in September 2020 was outrageous. “I miss her so much,” Breyer said. He revealed that when discussing the case with one of his legal clerks recently, he told the clerk: “Let’s go see Ruth’s thoughts.”

Breyer revealed that during the pandemic, he had been “driving Joanna” (his wife, psychologist) “crazy!” He had also been “working on my word processor.” “, meditate (“You really feel better,” he said), “fake bicycle riding” on “one of the machines”, and sparked several tweets about whether the judiciary owns Peloton-watch classic TV M* A * S * H ??replay.

This article is Originally published on the court Hao Hao.