breaking news

Due to the opposition of three liberal judges of the court, the Supreme Court refused on Monday Missouri death row inmate requirements Who is competing with the state’s lethal injection method and would like to recommend firing the squad as a more humane method of execution. Ernest Johnson (Ernest Johnson) lost nearly one-fifth of his brain tissue due to surgery to treat brain tumors. He believes that the drugs used in the lethal injection process in Missouri are very risky, which will make him Suffer “severe pain and suffering.” Prolonged seizure time. “As part of Order list Released after a private meeting of judges last week, the court rejected Johnson’s petition. Judges Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan agreed that Judge Sonia Sotomayor disagreed with this denial. Breyer also raised his own objections.

Johnson was convicted and sentenced to death for the murder of three gas station employees in the robbery. He initially proposed replacing lethal injections with nitrogen.Point out the Supreme Court’s 2019 ruling Bucklew v PrecytheThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit rejected Johnson’s request, arguing that a prisoner who wants to challenge the use of the death penalty in his specific case must find a viable alternative method that will “significantly reduce the serious risk of severe pain.” . It explained that nitrogen “is a “new method of execution”” and has never been used before.Opinion of the Supreme Court buckle The Court of Appeals held that the amendment clearly stated: “The Eighth Amendment does not require a country to adopt untested and untested enforcement methods.” The Court of Appeals also refused to allow Johnson to amend his indictment to propose dismissal of the bank-this This is the first dismissal plan proposed in Missouri since 1864.

Johnson came to the Supreme Court last summer and asked the justices to review the Eighth Circuit’s ruling. In late March, the court requested a further briefing on whether Johnson was allowed to file a new complaint, and proposed to expel the team as an alternative method. Johnson told the justice that the lower court is likely to reject the new complaint, and the state government agreed.

In her 10-page objection, Sotomayor complained that the decision of the Court of Appeal did not allow Johnson to pursue the shooting team as an alternative method of enforcement, which punished him “because he failed to anticipate the law caused by Johnson. Major changes. buckle. As a result, she went on to say that Johnson’s claims “will never be heard.” Sotomayor concluded: “Missouri can now execute Johnson in one way. At this stage of the proceedings, given his special medical condition, we must assume that he will be tortured. Quoting her objection buckle, She added: “It is of higher value than ensuring timely execution.”

Breyer raised his brief objection, in which he pointed out: “The difficulty of resolving this request 27 years after the murder case provides another example of how the current death penalty has brought about the fair implementation of the law. Special difficulties…”

Although Missouri rejected Johnson’s attempt to select the shooting team, some states showed interest in resuming the execution of the shooting team due to the difficulty in obtaining lethal injection drugs.Earlier this month, South Carolina passed a law requiring people to be sentenced to death Choose between electric chair and shooting squad. Now, in four states, it is legal to execute the death penalty by shooting.The last time I used a shooting squad in the U.S. was 2010 in Utah.

The judge will meet again on Thursday, May 27 for another private meeting. Orders for the conference are expected to be on Tuesday, June 1.

This post is Originally published on the court Hao Hao.